Idealistic Politics Essay Example for Free

Idealistic Politics analyseThe history of all hitherto existing troupe is the history of class struggles, said Karl Marx, who is considered to be nonp beil of the worlds most seminal thinkers. Marx categorized these classes in two broad categories the bourgeoisie versus the proletariats, the upper class opposed to the lower class and the caste that reserve access to the factors of production against bothbody else who are compelled to sell their labor. In semi policy-making terms the bourgeois were the committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie (Marx, 20) and in order to prune whatsoever friction, tension or resistance towards their supremacy they then laid down a bent of paragons and value for all classes and citizens. The ultimate goal of having a mo nononous set of principles was to disintegrate existing prototypes and values by instigating the proletariats to fully accept the bourgeois set of principles by suspending their own. History, h owever, has yet to see such an way out where the bourgeois triumph in instigating such circumstances successfully.What occurs in such circumstances instead is a conflict due to inconsistency that occurs between the dogmas of both classes whereby the reality based ideals of the proletariats clashes with the idealistic values of the bourgeoisie. These conflicts in spring up affect the political ideologies and actions since the politics is the arena where the battle of principles occurs, primarily due to two reasons. The commencement ceremony being that these conflicts will not surface in the first place except in the political arena due to the austere nature and secondly the outcomes will not be accepted unless at a level were they are made public and irreversible. Evidence of these conflicts exists in our texts and films, however in differing contexts.In Antig unitary, Creon represents the bourgeoisie and Antig angiotensin converting enzyme the proletariats in A Discourse on the virtuous Effects of the Arts and Sciences the arts and sciences were the debasing vales instigated by the intellectuals whilst the savage being was the unlearned and nave proletariat, and finally in Marxs Communist Manifesto where the distinctions are extremely clear among the two classes. In the course of my paper I wish to examine the fortissimo and weakness of each of these ideal societies and their implications to political ideology and action.The values of Karl Marxs idealist communist society may be summed up in the single sentence Abolition of private belongings (Marx, 34). He debated that in one case private ownership was abolished large number would change, and this would finally end the history of all class struggles. Communism to Marx was an cite or a purer form of socialism, whereby the pile owned everything and everybody worked for the system, hence no form of personal interests was vested in the system. This assumption was made by placing a gamble on homophile behavior, probably the most occasional factor to place any form of profitsr on. Marx was assuming that among a whole class of people no interests were separate and a vocalization from those of the proletariat as a whole (Marx, 33). The society that Marx visualized was one where all the citizens desired wholly the interests of the society by not desiring to satisfy their personal interests.History, however, does not have a basis for pure collectivism where a group of people have ceased to exist without any possessions and have lived precisely by the idea the closest analogy one could give would be of hunter-ga in that respectr societies. These societies, however, existed during the past times where human attitudes and behaviours were not being forever and a day reshaped by the changing economic systems in which people find themselves todayadays, which Marx himself mentions as there being no such thing as fixed human nature. Therefore, communism could never work because it g oes against human nature. People are instinctively more competitive than cooperative. Moreover, the possible action for revolution to occur where the bourgeoisie were to come down in their social status to the level of the proletariats and the proletariats establish to eminence of the bourgeoisies could only occur if human nature were to be dismantled, self memories be wiped out and in other words for the revolution to occur successfully in needs to be self induced.Marx in an indirect manner implies how ones self worth has decreased with the current system when he discusses the dynamics of wage labour and whether it creates property for the laborer. He states that the system is self-defeating for the laborers, which discountnot increase except upon school of begetting a impertinently supply of wage-laborer for fresh evolution (Marx 34). If we were to refer back to the analogy hunter-gatherer societies the fruits of ones labour were immediate when an individual catch his rewa rd was immediate and did not wait for his fruits or live only in so removed as the interest of the ruling class requires it (Marx. 35). In short mans worth and dignity has been demoralized and every individual has been converted in paid wage laborersand has reducedrelationss to a mere money relations (Marx, 21).Individuals were not bounded by the social status hunter-gatherer since everyone shared and everyone knew their worth. The advantage of this system is that it does not create any dwell for friction to occur because it does not include the idea of individuals desiring to wish to control the environment or vest any personal interests into the system. This can primarily be attributed to the value the system countenances of not deficiency to contrastiveiate people under any circumstances the system does not know race, ethnicity and differences of age and grammatical gender no longer have any distinctive social validity (Marx, 26), a trait of hunter-gatherer societies, which Marx so dearly desires.These values would in turn affect the political ideologies of a system trying to covert to communism by picking on the one essential condition for the existenceof the bourgeois class, the formation and the augmentation of capital the condition for capital is wage labour (Marx, 32). Therefore, the conflicts that would arise would be those that regarding wage labour and its supply the bourgeoisie would advocate any action that would enhance the competition between laborers the key behind keeping a round-the-clock supply of wage labour opposed to the proletariats immediate aim of cutting off this supply and by doing so ensuring its immediate aim of overthrowing the bourgeois supremacy. Any decline in wage labour would queer the bourgeoisies capital by reducing its turnover, hence weakening their foothold in the marketplace in turn inhibiting their ability to constantly revolutionize the instruments of production in order to exist and survive (Marx, 21).The bo urgeoisie involve to seek a continuous wage labour would see a shift in their political ideology they would seek to manipulate cities, provinces and other nations that are weak cause them to become dependent on them. The consequence of such political centralization would egest to the epidemic of overproduction, whereby the only manner in which the crises can be overcome is by the conquest of new markets, and by the and by the more through exploitation of the old ones (Marx, 25).However, such exploitation of markets can occur only to a certain limit, until other nations travel to regulations confiding the system to resort to desperate cards and fit, which occurred with China. Chinese products flooded the world market until recently and now they have been rejected entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) and do not enjoy the benefits of unacquainted(p) trade. Therefore, China have used enforced destruction of a mass of productive forces (Marx, 25) to decrease their output, which has lead to a lot of turmoil inside the country with dogmas of the government political stability and international science and the working class subsistence and a better life clashing against each other further depressing the situation.Like Karl Marx, J.J. Rousseau also painted a picture of ideal society. In his Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences he condemns how societies have succumbed to arts and sciences that have molded our behavior, and taught our passions to speak an artificial words (Rousseau, 6) with the desire to please one another with performances worthy of their mutual approbation (Rousseau, 4). He believed that individuals were imprisoned in the values and ideals of society that the arts and sciences strengthened, whereby everyone followed and nobody dared to be prompted by their inner selves in order not be seen as outcasts, resulting in man losing his individualism.In a nutshell, Rousseau believed that the arts and sciences had tain ted origins and they reinforced our crimes by fostering our desire for comfort by transforming individuals into sugar coated pills, whereby jealousy, suspicion, fear, coldness, reserve, hate and fraud lie constantly concealed under the uniform and deceitful veil of politeness (Rousseau, 7). He in turn imagine a society were he believed man was innately pious was not restrained by societys decorum therefore abandoning the possibilities o the vices that evolve in modern societies are nonexistent. He understood virtue in terms of bravery, courage and strength in other words he saw it in vulgar array power.The weaknesses in Rousseaus painting of the ideal society are the assumptions that are embedded in the enquire that he was addressing Whether the restoration of the arts and sciences has had the effect of purifying or corrupting morals? Rousseau has to assume that there has been a revival in the arts as well as assume a race between abstract and applied knowledge with morality t hat being the human behavior and customs a society embraces. Such assumptions lead Rousseau to base his argument on a set of contradictions. He see the values of the Persians, Germans and Spartans who had an unusual social structure where there was no study of abstract education, no ingathering of property and military virtues were emphasized. The idealizations of such societies contradicted his resentment for etiquette or what he referred to as the veil of politeness, since there exists no organization whereby more discipline, etiquette or order to our rude but natural morals is required than military organizations.Throughout the discourse the theme of man becoming corrupt once he enters society and losing his individuality because they all act the same under the same circumstances alike (Rousseau, 6) is repeatedly emphasized. This argument in itself is self-defeating because if it is the grouping of people that induces people to conceal themselves and live among uncertainty, Rou sseaus ideal society would truly only function for isolated individuals since such a level of purity could not occur in the natural dynamics of human societies. When individuals interact, the views and ideals of others will indeed affect the way the individual will live his life, since it is part of human nature to conform to the rules and regulations of others, which are a collection of ideals and values that compromise the principles of society.For a society to function in harmony there has to be some common ground whereby all the different members of that society must conform to and must sacrifice some of their individual ideals for the betterment of the society. Rousseau argues that man would not have to sacrifice his own ideals if he was not placed in the blasphemies of modern societies since he assumes adult male are sincerely good and everyone would approve of the actions of others. This in itself breaks Rousseaus argument since there is exists no yardstick to measure good a nd even if there were to exist such a measure, differences on which good is appropriate would in turn cause conflicts.The simplicity of the society Rousseau describes is its initial strength the simpler ones life, the palette on which he is to limited his bad perspectives becomes less like the American savageswho live entirely on the products of the chaseand yoke, indeed, cannot be imposed on men who stand in need of nothing (Rousseau,5). In a society where the needs do not exceed the basic physiological, safety and social needs and are readily satisfied the room for corruption becomes minimal. Therefore, I believe Rousseaus attack on the arts and sciences is not so much on their origins or sources but more so on how it manages to widen our needs to include self-actualization and self-realization needs, which are needs that are satisfied by luxuries and how we appear in relation to the people surrounding us a need where the veil and corruption required to have those needs satisfied .Rousseaus painting of such an ideal society would not require a political system, however if all his assumptions were suspended the political implications would be drastic. In politics rarely is something said literally and in a society where the members innately believe that everyone is sincerely good, would not be capable of reading between the lines and would end up in turmoil since other nations would manipulate their naivety. Furthermore, in a society where abstract knowledge such a geometry and political economy is not taught the politicians will be incapable of drawing upon actions that will be favour their society, since politics is the devilish of all sciences and without a good base in its basic terminology that being the abstract sciences one will be incapable of mastering it and using it to his advantage.Speak from their heartoffend someone.do not take careIn Antigone the Greek tragedy, morals, egos, and gender issues were the epics around which principles were based upon.Follow one manHarun Al Rashid..Mamluks..they use to be all loyalLower class has less say in the political era in order to stop the formation of proletariats which is so important for the revolution to occur.Political laws that protect private propertyEnhance competitiveness (p.21)Dependence of poor countries on rich (.23)Eradicate opposition immediately effectivity of prletarits p.28 trade unionsp.32 existence remains on capital1) Basecaus they lay down ideals that seem utopian only to them, they forget2) Might have noticed that there are more cons than prosSeveral of our texts paint images of ideal human society. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these imagined societies. How do these imagined ideal societies interact with political ideology and political action.BibliographyMarx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. bare-ass York Bantam, 1992.Sophocles. The Three Theban Plays Antigone, Oedipus The King, Oedipus at Colonus. Trans. RobertFagles. New York Pe nguin, 1977.Communism Could Never work Because it goes against human nature. People are naturally more competitive than cooperative. http//www.wsu.edu/brians/hum_303/nature.html