Pablo Picaso “Olga”

The portraying of Olga is a naturalistic depiction of Picassos wife. I think that the missing arm chair, the shadow, the darkness, and the paleness of Olga are a manse from Picasso that their relationship was non always so good. I assume this because from the grade http//www. sapergalleries. com/PicassoWomen. html I found that their marriage had its ups and downs and they were two different people. This impression is well painted. It gives me a feeling that Olga was present when Picasso painted this portrait. This woman is gorgeous and I think that Picasso would paint his wife beautifully.The imperfections in the Olga portrait motivate me of Picassos first Cubism photo, Les Demoiselles dAvignon because of the shadow in the back ground that does not seem to fit Olgas shape. If you look at the Cubism painting Picasso uses a lot of shadow and fuzzy lines in the back ground screw the women. I intrust that when you look at the Olga painting long liberal you can tell that is was not meant to be a perfect portrait of his wife therefore I believe that it is more of a cubist painting. That is very interesting because I thought that is looked as if the painting was do in person.Now that I know that he painted Olga from a motion-picture show of her does not change my mind that the piece reflects the cubism paintings. In the other painting the women that Picasso pained the women look distorted and not human like. I believe that these women probably were not painted by picture but by imagination and emotion of Pablo Picasso. All in all, I believe that Picasso had a talent of portraying women in many different ways. His work is bewitching and very different than a lot of other artists work.